<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the new Fx prefix-less Flex Gumbo builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/</link>
	<description>Just a bunch of Adobe Flex Examples</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter deHaan</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-4167</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter deHaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/#comment-4167</guid>
		<description>Peter Lindener,

I updated the example for you: http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/10/25/incrementally-3d-rotating-objects-in-flex-using-the-fxrotate3d-in-flex/

But I didn&#039;t have a chance to update the SWF. So if you View Source, the code will be &quot;wrong&quot; if you&#039;re using the latest API.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Lindener,</p>
<p>I updated the example for you: <a href="http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/10/25/incrementally-3d-rotating-objects-in-flex-using-the-fxrotate3d-in-flex/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/10/25/incrementally-3d-rotating-objects-in-flex-using-the-fxrotate3d-in-flex/</a></p>
<p>But I didn&#8217;t have a chance to update the SWF. So if you View Source, the code will be &#8220;wrong&#8221; if you&#8217;re using the latest API.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lindener</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-4169</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lindener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/#comment-4169</guid>
		<description>Help!

   I&#039;m drownding in all this Name space upset...... I&#039;m fairly new to Felx,
and was just diving into trying out one of the 3D examples posted on this sight..

See :
http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/10/25/incrementally-3d-rotating-objects-in-flex-using-the-fxrotate3d-in-flex/

I got the example to work under the last &quot;stable&quot; Gumbo API, but as the name space shifted all around....I&#039;m felling rather discouraged to figure out how to get the same example to compile under the latest beta, builds of the Gumbo API.....   I relize that Name space issues are a real thing that best be gotten to a stable and well formed place....  Then this is sure feeling like rather turbulent sailing from my end. Can anyone help me with exactly what its going to take in terms of adjustment to get one of the existing 3D Flex programing examples up and running with the new name space changes.....   this feels like just a bit much for a Flex newbi to be taking in all at once....   I will gladly return the favor, once I&#039;m up to speed.

   -Peter Lindener</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help!</p>
<p>   I&#8217;m drownding in all this Name space upset&#8230;&#8230; I&#8217;m fairly new to Felx,<br />
and was just diving into trying out one of the 3D examples posted on this sight..</p>
<p>See :<br />
<a href="http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/10/25/incrementally-3d-rotating-objects-in-flex-using-the-fxrotate3d-in-flex/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/10/25/incrementally-3d-rotating-objects-in-flex-using-the-fxrotate3d-in-flex/</a></p>
<p>I got the example to work under the last &#8220;stable&#8221; Gumbo API, but as the name space shifted all around&#8230;.I&#8217;m felling rather discouraged to figure out how to get the same example to compile under the latest beta, builds of the Gumbo API&#8230;..   I relize that Name space issues are a real thing that best be gotten to a stable and well formed place&#8230;.  Then this is sure feeling like rather turbulent sailing from my end. Can anyone help me with exactly what its going to take in terms of adjustment to get one of the existing 3D Flex programing examples up and running with the new name space changes&#8230;..   this feels like just a bit much for a Flex newbi to be taking in all at once&#8230;.   I will gladly return the favor, once I&#8217;m up to speed.</p>
<p>   -Peter Lindener</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-4164</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/#comment-4164</guid>
		<description>This makes sense :-) Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes sense :-) Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter deHaan</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-4168</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter deHaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/#comment-4168</guid>
		<description>Florian,

Correct. The Halo components have new skins so they look the same as the Spark components. This allows you to mix and match Halo+Spark components in the same application and have a consistent look.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florian,</p>
<p>Correct. The Halo components have new skins so they look the same as the Spark components. This allows you to mix and match Halo+Spark components in the same application and have a consistent look.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I can compile your source code without any errors using the current SDK (4.0.0.5900). But all four components are displayed as Spark components (The two halo components are also Spark).
Any ideas?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I can compile your source code without any errors using the current SDK (4.0.0.5900). But all four components are displayed as Spark components (The two halo components are also Spark).<br />
Any ideas?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geecu</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-4165</link>
		<dc:creator>geecu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/04/02/using-the-new-fx-prefix-less-flex-gumbo-builds/#comment-4165</guid>
		<description>Besides the obvious SEO you could do something a little useful and post the compiled examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the obvious SEO you could do something a little useful and post the compiled examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
