<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Converting XML to objects using the Flex SimpleXMLDecoder class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/</link>
	<description>Just a bunch of Adobe Flex Examples</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8029</link>
		<dc:creator>henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-8029</guid>
		<description>i guess there is a method called decode() in the xml class. that decodes the xml data instantly. you do not have to code anything.. just get ur schema and load ur xml and holla the rest is done for ya ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess there is a method called decode() in the xml class. that decodes the xml data instantly. you do not have to code anything.. just get ur schema and load ur xml and holla the rest is done for ya ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doris</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Doris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Somebody can explain me what&#039;s the meaning of resultObj=[object Object] ?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Somebody can explain me what&#8217;s the meaning of resultObj=[object Object] ?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter deHaan</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter deHaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>@judah,

I haven&#039;t done a lot of performance testing on the different XML classes. I just generally stick with the new E4X stuff since parsing large blocks of XML is a lot easier. If you got the XMLDocument/XMLNode solution working you can probably just stick with that, and document your code well so when somebody looks at the project in 3 years they don&#039;t scratch their head wondering what this old ActionScript 2.0-esque XML code is doing in there. :)

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@judah,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t done a lot of performance testing on the different XML classes. I just generally stick with the new E4X stuff since parsing large blocks of XML is a lot easier. If you got the XMLDocument/XMLNode solution working you can probably just stick with that, and document your code well so when somebody looks at the project in 3 years they don&#8217;t scratch their head wondering what this old ActionScript 2.0-esque XML code is doing in there. :)</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judah</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>judah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>When I say downside I mean that I&#039;m using this code in a Flex preloader so performance and memory wise. I tried using the XML class but couldn&#039;t coerce it to an XMLNode. I timed it using the XMLDocument class and it took only 10ms to parse. I can live that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I say downside I mean that I&#8217;m using this code in a Flex preloader so performance and memory wise. I tried using the XML class but couldn&#8217;t coerce it to an XMLNode. I timed it using the XMLDocument class and it took only 10ms to parse. I can live that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judah</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>judah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re the new hotness :P Is there any downside to using the new XML class over the XMLDocument class?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the new hotness :P Is there any downside to using the new XML class over the XMLDocument class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter deHaan</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7879</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter deHaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7879</guid>
		<description>@judah,

Yeah, XML/E4X is the new hotness, I&#039;d stick with that wherever possible.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@judah,</p>
<p>Yeah, XML/E4X is the new hotness, I&#8217;d stick with that wherever possible.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judah</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>judah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7877</guid>
		<description>Should we use XML now instead of XMLDocument?

3574	Migration issue: The ActionScript 2.0 XML class has been renamed XMLDocument. 	 This is a code migration warning. XML is a different class in ActionScript 3.0 than it was in ActionScript 2.0. In ActionScript 3.0, the XMLDocument class is the equivalent of the XML class in ActionScript 2.0. The ActionScript 3.0 XML class offers improved functionality with an easier and more powerful API. See XML in the ActionScript Language Reference for additional details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we use XML now instead of XMLDocument?</p>
<p>3574	Migration issue: The ActionScript 2.0 XML class has been renamed XMLDocument. 	 This is a code migration warning. XML is a different class in ActionScript 3.0 than it was in ActionScript 2.0. In ActionScript 3.0, the XMLDocument class is the equivalent of the XML class in ActionScript 2.0. The ActionScript 3.0 XML class offers improved functionality with an easier and more powerful API. See XML in the ActionScript Language Reference for additional details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rconceiver</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7597</link>
		<dc:creator>rconceiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7597</guid>
		<description>hi
simplexmldecoder returns node as ObjectProxy than arraycollection if there is only one node in parent tag.

any solution?

-rc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
simplexmldecoder returns node as ObjectProxy than arraycollection if there is only one node in parent tag.</p>
<p>any solution?</p>
<p>-rc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marakame</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7550</link>
		<dc:creator>Marakame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7550</guid>
		<description>In addition to this you can use CDATA 

Peter thank you for your post. Useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to this you can use CDATA </p>
<p>Peter thank you for your post. Useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marakame</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/comment-page-1/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator>Marakame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/09/19/converting-xml-to-objects-using-the-flex-simplexmldecoder-class/#comment-7549</guid>
		<description>Tom, how about base64 Encode/Decode ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, how about base64 Encode/Decode ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

